Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1993)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger @ lehman . com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1993 13:15:34 -0400
To: "Leland K. Neely" <lkn @ llnl . gov>
Cc: Dan . Farmer @ corp . sun . com, rens @ imsi . com, firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Oct 1993 09:25:14 PDT." <9310221621 . AA07468 @ mycroft . GreatCircle . COM>
Reply-to: pmetzger @ lehman . com

Leland K. Neely says:
> Flame on:
> Please refrain from disclosing bug particulars on an email list.
> 
> All we need is to have hackers get the inside poop on a hole faster
> than we can patch it.
[...]
> Flame off.
> 
> I know you are trying to understand the vulnerability, but please consider
> the (potential) audience when asking such questions.

The hackers are already furiously working on this. Meanwhile, I have a
multi-billion dollar company thats potentially vulnerable and I don't
have enough real information to be able to decide on a reasonable
response. I'm not running a standard sendmail, no one will tell me
what the bug is so I can check if I'm vulnerable, I can't go out and
use the patched Sun sendmail because I don't run it, etc.

In other words, all this has succeeded in doing is making me paranoid
and I have no idea what to do.

You, Mr. Neely, might be perfectly happy not knowing what the
vulnerability is, but I *NEED* to know.

Perry



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger @ lehman . com>
Next: Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: Tom Fitzgerald <fitz @ wang . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: Leland K. Neely <lkn @ llnl . gov>
Next: Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: Eric Conrad <conrad @ merl . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com