Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1993)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: smail vs. sendmail
From: smb @ research . att . com
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 22:57:02 EDT
To: brian @ lloyd . com (Brian Lloyd)
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

	 Seems to be lots of heat but not a lot of light.

	 Sendmail has always been a big unknown WRT security.  So there is YASSB
	 (yet another sendmail security bug).  Ho hum, nothing new.  Well, if
	 sendmail is such a pain, what about other mailers?  How about smail?  
	 MMDF? Something new and much simpler?  I would be really interested
	 in hearing about the security issues surrounding these packages.

A big unknown?  Not at all.  We *know* it has more holes; we just
don't know what they are at the moment....  In fact, I was quoting
that line to someone in a meeting at more or less the exact time that
the CERT advisory must have been showing up in my mailbox.  I'd call
it a coincidence, except that as you say:  ho hum, nothing new about
YASSB.  When it comes to security bigger=>badder.  As Fred Grampp once
remarked in a similar context (about why mailx on SVR4 was setgid):
``You don't give privileges to a whale''.


		--Steve Bellovin


Indexed By Date Previous: smail vs. sendmail
From: brian @ lloyd . com (Brian Lloyd)
Next: UNSUBSRIBE
From: bennetc @ gov . on . ca (Cameron Bennett)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: smail vs. sendmail
From: Bob Dew <rdew @ alw . nih . gov>
Next: Re: smail vs. sendmail
From: mjr @ TIS . COM

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com