Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Tripwire tw.db_* database
From: heiser @ world . std . com (Bill Heiser)
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 1994 09:54:00 -0500 (EST)
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

I have a question for those of you using Tripwire v1.1 to protect
your Firewalls.  How are you dealing with the catch-22 problem of
how to protect the Tripwire database itself?  When you create the
database with "tripwire -initialize", and then later do an integrity
run, Tripwire reports the database as "changed" or "new" (depending on
whether or not one existed before).    Even if you use the 
"tripwire -update" or "tripwire -interactive" options to update
the entry for the database in the database itself, the next integrity
run still reports the file has having changed.

Have any of you come up with ways to avoid this catch-22 situation?

Thanks,
Bill
-- 
 Bill Heiser   heiser @
 world .
 std .
 com


Indexed By Date Previous: RE:DNS forwarders / slaves
From: Henning . Tranberg @ ti-oslo . televerket . tele . no
Next: Re: Interlock bug
From: "Michael Nittmann, Principal Communications Analyst, The Trane Company (608 787 3792)" <NITTMANN @ UWLAX . EDU>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE:DNS forwarders / slaves
From: Henning . Tranberg @ ti-oslo . televerket . tele . no
Next: Re: Tripwire tw.db_* database
From: Mark Verber <verber @ parc . xerox . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com