Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: 'don't *bother* flaming about mail fakery'
From: "Michael Nittmann, Principal Communications Analyst, The Trane Company (608 787 3792)" <NITTMANN @ UWLAX . EDU>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 94 13:43 CDT
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

I like this very much. This is exactly the situation I would like to 
remedy. 
Presently, all mailers must accept whatever is coming in since the 
incoming string can be <> at diverse places (from, rec from, I am 
gobbling them all up right now).
the choice is to accept everything, which is ok for a simple backend 
smtp server
              to filter and verify originators, which runs into a 
snag presently when there is an allowed <>
              to reject all <> which puts the firewall server into 
violation with present RFCs.
A change of just this little piece in the smtp protocol would assure 
that all instances of a message can optionally be verified. This 
verification is only useful on firewall systems. Systems within a 
trusted environment would not need to care at all.

MIke

Indexed By Date Previous: email workgroup for rfc 821/822/1123 modification
From: "Michael Nittmann, Principal Communications Analyst, The Trane Company (608 787 3792)" <NITTMANN @ UWLAX . EDU>
Next: Ce qui est a cesar est a cesar. so please stop talking about mail problems here.
From: saouli @ math . ethz . ch
Indexed By Thread Previous: email workgroup for rfc 821/822/1123 modification
From: "Michael Nittmann, Principal Communications Analyst, The Trane Company (608 787 3792)" <NITTMANN @ UWLAX . EDU>
Next: Re: 'don't *bother* flaming about mail fakery'
From: dcrocker @ mordor . stanford . edu (Dave Crocker)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com