Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Cisco 3101 as a firewall
From: Brent Chapman <brent @ mycroft . GreatCircle . COM>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 17:04:18 -0800
To: Ray Hunter ECD <RHUNTER%ESOC . BITNET @ vm . gmd . de>
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 31 Mar 94 14:01:51 EST

Ray Hunter ECD <RHUNTER%ESOC .
 BITNET @
 vm .
 gmd .
 de> writes:

# David Conran asks: is a Cisco 3101 suitable as a Firewall?
# 
# Personal experience (confirmed by other notes I've seen on the net)
# tells me that setting *any* access list slows down routing considerably.
# (due to disabling of fast-switching.) However, the *length* of the
# access list does not affect performance that much more.
# The typical performance hit I've seen quoted is in the range of 20-30%

The key question is: does this 20-30% hit matter to your application?
If you're talking about ether-to-ether (or faster, like FDDI or T-3),
and expect heavy loads, then it probably does matter.

However, most firewalls are bottlenecked by a 56 kb/s or 1.544 mb/s
(T-1) leased line connection; even if it takes a 20-30% performance
hit because of packet filtering, I think a Cisco 3000-series router is
still fast enough to drive a 56 kb/s or 1.544 mb/s line at full rated
speed.


-Brent
--
Brent Chapman         | Great Circle Associates  | Call or email for info about
Brent @
 GreatCircle .
 COM | 1057 West Dana Street    | upcoming Internet Security 
+1 415 962 0841       | Mountain View, CA  94041 | Firewalls Tutorial dates

Indexed By Date Previous:
From: (nil)
Next: Mixing Authentification Strategies
From: Steve Simmons <scs @ lokkur . dexter . mi . us>
Indexed By Thread Previous:
From: (nil)
Next: Re: Cisco 3101 as a firewall
From: Ray Hunter ECD <RHUNTER%ESOC . BITNET @ vm . gmd . de>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com