Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Mixing Authentification Strategies
From: Steve Simmons <scs @ lokkur . dexter . mi . us>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 20:19:31 -0500 (EST)
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com (Firewalls Mailing List)

I've been looking at skey, one-time pads, etc.  One issue which doesn't
seem to be addressed is the mixing of authentication types.  For example,
inside a reasonably secure net one might chose to use `ordinary' unix
authentication.  When accessing from outside, one might want to normally
use skey, but fall back to a set of memorized one-time passwords if no
local/trustworthy skey generator is available.

The trick is how to decide on the fly which to use.  Alternate ports for
alternate authentications involves excessive memorization.  What I'd do
if I were recoding login.c is to let one modify the login id to indicate
desired authentication type:

   login: scs		# system default
   login: scs/skey	# skey
   login: scs/onetime	# one-time list
   login: scs/unix	# normal unix
   login: scs/whatever	# local custom job

A good implementation would refuse to do the wrong thing, eg, not permit
scs/unix from locations known to be outside the secured facility. If
anybody's thought seriously about the virtues of this or has other
solutions, I'd love to hear it.

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Cisco 3101 as a firewall
From: Brent Chapman <brent @ mycroft . GreatCircle . COM>
Next: Re: INN on a Firewall vs Socks proxy NNTP
From: Brent Chapman <brent @ mycroft . GreatCircle . COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Cisco 3101 as a firewall
From: Steve Kennedy <steve @ gbnet . org>
Next: Re: Mixing Authentification Strategies
From: Marcus J Ranum <mjr @ tis . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com