Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: TIS Toolkit vs DEC's SEAL
From: "Matt D'Errico" <matt @ magna . com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1994 16:31:24 -0400
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, pvz @ world . std . com

For that matter, there's also ANS+Core Interlock as a complete
hardware/software package...

My company has just contracted TIS to do the installation after some
exhaustive research of a bunch.  We've found the TIS folks to be
extremely reasonable in price (they also will vary price based on
existing client expertise) and the most flexible with regard to platform.

We happened to have some surplus Sun's and were more than willing to
help us work with them...  They're also correcting some DNS problems
along the way, much less security specific issues...

And no, TIS is not restricted to dual-homed implementations.  We're
using a classic 2 router/ bastion host approach.  The nicest thing I
just learned only today is that the TIS architecture allows our
very large network requirements to expand by adding more bastion hosts
if needed !

My vote: TIS...

-- Doc


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: ntop
From: Barney Wolff <barney @ databus . com>
Next: Re: probe_tcp_ports
From: Daniel R Ehrlich <ehrlich @ cse . psu . edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: TIS Toolkit vs DEC's SEAL
From: Peter von Zirpolo <pvz @ world . std . com>
Next: Re: TIS Toolkit vs DEC's SEAL
From: Michael Platoff <map @ yogi . siemens . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com