>
>> First not all Internet connections are T1; some folks have faster lines.
>> Second, not all firewalls are built between the Internet and an internal
>> network; firewalls can and are being used to separate internal networks.
>> Is screend running on a 486 "fast enough" to keep up at ethernet speed?
>> How about faster than a T1?
>
>A KarlBridge will do around 9500 packets/second (and the lastest version
>SHOULD support wire-speed r.s.n).
>
Well, let see. The other day, your sales pitch was for a thing you
called a KarlBrouter. This was to satisfy the routing specifications.
Do I detect a bait and switch here? Is this the same unit?
>By the time you have put a system together to run screend - the KB solution
>should sound reasonable.
>
You can do the 486/50 DX for about $1750 if you build it yourself.
Even cheaper if you just happen to have one laying around. Many
businesses do.
>
>Contact sales @
karlnet .
com or sales @
gbnet .
com for sales info or
>nisca.acs.ohio-state.edu:/pub/kbridge for a demo version.
Can we please put this in a FAQ and deposit on ftp.greatcircle.com
as suggested by Brent so all can make their own decision instead
of the sales pitch. ThankX
>
>Regards
>
>Steve
>
>--
> ___ |_ ___ ___ Tel: +44 (0)71 483 1169 Voice
>(___ | (___) \ / (___) Data: 483 2454 WorldBlazer T3000 PEP+/v32bis...
> ___) | (___ \/ (___ Data: 483 2455 WorldBlazer T3000 V32bis/PEP+...
> ISDN: 722 7969/70
>Email [MIME OK] Snail Mail
>steve @
gbnet .
{org,com,net} [home] Steve Kennedy
>steve @
marvin .
demon .
co .
uk [DIS dialup internet] Flat 2, 43 Howitt Rd
>stevek @
cellnet .
co .
uk [work] London, NW3 4LU
>
>
References:
|
|
