Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(May 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Network Sniffer
From: Mark Fullmer <maf @ cob . ohio-state . edu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 10:48:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
Reply-to: maf+ @ osu . edu

Eric .
 Vyncke @
 csl .
 sni .
 be writes:

>3) it is _IMPOSSIBLE_ to receive frames transmitted on a Ethernet segment 
>which is not local (my Sniffer in Belgium cannot receive your Ethernet 
>frames!) or which is repeated. Obvious exceptions: if the frame is bridged 
>to the destination via the LAN segment where the sniffer is tapped _OR_ if 
>the frame is routed (IP, DECnet, ...) via the LAN segment where the sniffer 
>is tapped.

Many bridges can have their learn tables faked into letting through traffic..

Exceptions are bridges that have a learn table lockdown, or a reasonably 
long timeout before re-learning a mac address.

Even with a learn table lockdown, if you are using a bridge to isolate 
traffic for security reasons, that bridge should somehow log (ie syslog, 
snmp trap, etc) when an mac address switches ports.

-- 
mark
maf+ @
 osu .
 edu


Indexed By Date Previous: Advice on Firewall Politics
From: francis @ avalle . insoft . com (John [Francis] Stracke)
Next: Firewalling a university. (Advice on Firewall politics)
From: yerkes_chuck @ jpmorgan . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Network Sniffer
From: Eric . Vyncke @ csl . sni . be (Eric Vyncke)
Next: Re[2]: Network Sniffer
From: "Rhett, Joe" <JRhett @ sextantgroup . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com