Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(May 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Allowing Magic Kingdom Access.
From: Karyn Pichnarczyk <karyn @ cheetah . llnl . gov>
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 15:47:41 -0700
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

   |On occasion, engineers and customer support folk from our site go out
   |into the big bad world, and want to get back into the network via the
   |Internet connection.  There are some obvious advantages to this - cost,
   |convenience and speed being the most significant.  This activity is
   |usually done from a customer site that is connected to the Internet.
   |
   [ ... ]
   |
   |It seems like the only safe way to do this is to actually give the
   |remote user an encrypted telnet capability so that even the clear
   |passwords aren't sniffable at the remote site.  Given this,  I have
   |two questions:
   |
   |1) Am I *too* paranoid about all of this?  Are we going too far?
   |
   |2) If not, what are the restrictions for running encrypted telnet
   |   in other countries?  Should we be concerned about this?

You've got more options other than encrypted telnet: like perhaps a
smart card with a one-time-only password.  It might be a little hard
and cost something, but it's another option.  Yet another option is
other one-time password technologies, such as s/key (but I don't know
if there's any international restrictions).  Then you have the bastion
host idea as well.  

karyn




Indexed By Date Previous: syslog time stamps
From: lai @ premenos . com (C. Patrick Lai)
Next: Re: Mosaic and E-mail
From: yerkes_chuck @ jpmorgan . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Allowing Magic Kingdom Access.
From: mark @ escact . ksc . nasa . gov (Mark E. Gibbons)
Next: No subject
From: an35331 @ anon . penet . fi

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com