Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Cisco software update? (fwd)
From: tom @ pserv1 . dot . state . az . us (Tom Brink)
Organization: Arizona Department of Transportation Computer Aided Engineering Section
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 94 12:28:47 MST
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com (Firewalls)
Reply-to: tom @ pserv1 . dot . state . az . us

Paul Ferguson writes:
> > By the way, while we're talking about shortcomings of Cisco routers as
> > firewall routers, let me add one more that I forgot about last night:
> > logging.  They don't do adequate logging of their packet filtering
> > activities.
> >
> 
> I'd have to say that cisco offers much more flexibility than _most_ of
> their competitors - they are one of the few that offer IP port level
> filtering and also support TACACS.

Am rather curious about the course this thread is taking.  One of my
main complaints about router based firewalls is the lack of logging
of packet filtering.  Do any routers do a decent job of logging this
type of information?
-- 
Tom Brink
Technical Support Specialist
Arizona Department of Transportation
tom @
 dot .
 state .
 az .
 us


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Cisco software update?
From: jak @ mentat . com (Jim Krupp)
Next: Re: Cisco software update? (fwd)
From: Aydin Edguer <edguer @ MorningStar . Com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: traceroute for HP
From: bino @ fbino . llnl . gov (Frank Bino)
Next: Re: Cisco software update? (fwd)
From: Aydin Edguer <edguer @ MorningStar . Com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com