Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: using socks to hide internal IP addresses
From: ericm @ MicroUnity . com (Eric Murray)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 94 10:04:20 MDT
To: pjh70 @ eng . amdahl . com (Patrick J. Horgan)
Cc: sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9406151521 . AA20428 @ cliffy . eng . amdahl . com>; from "Patrick J. Horgan" at Jun 15, 94 8:21 am

Patrick J. Horgan wrote:
> 
> But if you used one of the subnets reserved for private subnets only, you're
> saying that you're going to keep this subnet private!  This implies no inter-
> net access.

Or all packets will go through a proxy service that's dual-homed to
the internal private net, and an external registered 'real' net.
So all the packets from inside wind up getting 'laundered'
through the proxy, and are thus legal.

Which is what the original poster wanted to do, no?


--
     ericm         ericm @
 microunity .
 com


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Notes from Usenix Firewall BOF
From: crow!rik @ uunet . uu . net (Rik Farrow 602 282 0242 MST)
Next: NNTP as a trusted service
From: howard . b . owen @ octel . com (Howard B Owen)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: using socks to hide internal IP addresses
From: jim @ chiba . Tadpole . COM (Jim Thompson)
Next: using socks to hide internal IP addresses
From: francis @ avalle . insoft . com (John [Francis] Stracke)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com