Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: using socks to hide internal IP addresses
From: francis @ avalle . insoft . com (John [Francis] Stracke)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 1994 13:35:50 +0500
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Eric Murray's message of Wed, 15 Jun 94 10:04:20 MDT <9406151704 . AA17739 @ angst . microunity . com>

>Patrick J. Horgan wrote:
>> 
>> But if you used one of the subnets reserved for private subnets only, you're
>> saying that you're going to keep this subnet private! This implies no inter-
>> net access.
>
>Or all packets will go through a proxy service that's dual-homed to
>the internal private net, and an external registered 'real' net.

Or, better yet, the provider can let you use one of their #s, rather
than you registering your own net & taking up a whole class C.

/============================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke | My opinions are my own. | PGP public key available |
|InSoft, Inc.           |====================================================|
|Mechanicsburg, PA      | Sleep is for wimps--healthy, well-adjusted wimps,  |
|francis @
 insoft .
 com     |  but wimps nonetheless.                            |
\============================================================================/


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: NNTP as a trusted service
From: howard . b . owen @ octel . com (Howard B Owen)
Next: Re: NNTP as a trusted service
From: "Michael S. Hines" <MSHINES @ freh-02 . adpc . purdue . edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: using socks to hide internal IP addresses
From: ericm @ MicroUnity . com (Eric Murray)
Next: Re: using socks to hide internal IP addresses
From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com