>
> X.400 does nothing to solve the problem being discussed.
>
>Fred
>
Short and sweet, but why are you saying this?
I have had several responses like this. Let me know what you are thinking and I will
answer the concerns as best I can.
Note: A lot of people associate Sprint Mail and AT&T mail with X.400. While they are
X.400, they are poor examples. X.400 should be run by the user organization, just like
SMTP. The pieces are a little differnet though, and the security is more industrial
strength when done according to the standards.
-------------------------------------
Name: Dorian W Smith
E-mail: dsmith @
isc .
nva .
ge .
com (Dorian W Smith)
Date: 27 JUN 94
Time: 2155
This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
Follow-Ups:
|
|