Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: How About Netblazers?
From: "Christopher A. Stewart" <stewart @ networx . com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 1994 03:35:07 +0800
To: johns @ oxygen . house . gov (John Schnizlein)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com, titan!gustavo @ enuucp . eas . asu . edu
In-reply-to: <9407081845 . AA32873 @ oxygen . house . gov>
References: <9407081845 . AA32873 @ oxygen . house . gov>
Reply-to: stewart @ networx . com

Another reason not to trust netblazers for use as a firewall router is
at least in the version of software (2.0x5) I've got the packet
filtering appears to be untrustworthy.. I was running a set of rules
where the default was to deny everything. Global rules that permitted
packets for the net seem to only work half the hosts.. I had to enter
rules for individual hosts that the where gobal rules didn't work.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher A. Stewart       | (Standard disclaimers are in effect)
System/Network Adminstrator  |
Legent Corp. Networx Div.    |
Bellevue, Wa. 98004          |
Voice (206)-688-2154         |
Fax (206)-688-2050           |


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: How About Netblazers?
From: newsham @ uhunix . uhcc . Hawaii . Edu
Next: Re: Source routing and IP forwarding on SunOs4.1.3
From: Herb Peyerl <Herb . Peyerl @ sidney . novatel . ca>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: How About Netblazers?
From: newsham @ uhunix . uhcc . Hawaii . Edu
Next: Re: How About Netblazers?
From: "William C. Fenner" <fenner @ cmf . nrl . navy . mil>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com