I have currently built TIS under 2.4 FCS Sparc and x86...
I am currently testing it here... so far so good except for some funkiness
in the /usr/ucblib stuff...
let me know what you find out...
kelly
p.s. I am working with TIS alpha...
> From firewalls-owner @
GreatCircle .
COM Fri Sep 16 12:08 PDT 1994
> To: firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM
> Cc: twj @
world .
std .
com
> Subject: Summary: Building TIS on Solaris 2.3
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 12:17:29 -0400
> From: Todd W Joseph <twj @
world .
std .
com>
>
>
> I received several replies asking me to summarize responses to my
> original mail. My original mail is enclosed.
>
> Many people suggested I swith to SunOS 4.1.3. I wish I could. I am
> saddled with Solaris 2.3 for various reasons at my site.
>
> Most people were curious about how well the TIS toolkit I built
> worked. It is still a bit early to tell, but tn-gw, ftp-gw, netacl,
> and smap/smapd all seem to work well after limited testing.
>
> One person said that building with the /usr/ucblib libs is crazed and
> that things will fail in random ways. I have heard this statement
> before regarding SVR4 in general (thus my original mail), but I wonder
> if this is a problem with Solaris 2.3.
>
> Because Sun has strong BSD ties & is trying to sell SVR4 to their BSD
> installed base, I would expect them to have the best ucblibs of all
> the SVR4 vendors.
>
> I contacted Sun support to find out what condition the /usr/ucblib's
> are in. I had to explain what the /usr/ucblib's were and wait a few
> days to hear back. Sun told me that some things work well and others
> don't. I asked for more specifics and have not heard back from them
> (it's been roughly a week).
>
> I'll keep the list up to date as things change.
>
> Todd Joseph
> twj @
world .
std .
com
>
> -------- Original Mail to Firewalls:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have built the TIS toolkit on Solaris 2.3 using the Sun C compiler
> and the /ucb/ucb/cc shell script -- which uses /usr/ucblib instead of
> /usr/lib. Everything except ftpd built cleanly with little effort.
>
> Has anyone else built the TIS toolkit in this way? If so, are there
> any gotchas?
>
> I'll summarize if there is signifigant interest.
>
> Todd
> twj @
world .
std .
com
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
