Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: commercial vs roll-yer-own
From: bmanning @ ISI . EDU
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 1994 15:35:50 -0800 (PST)
To: hobbit @ bronze . lcs . mit . edu (*Hobbit*)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199412170710 . CAA19857 @ bronze . lcs . mit . edu> from "*Hobbit*" at Dec 17, 94 02:10:48 am
Posted-date: Sun, 18 Dec 1994 15:35:50 -0800 (PST)

> 
> Anyone who sells you a black box labeled "network security firewall" with
> no further information or without the bigger picture is selling you a false
> sense of security, regardless of what's in the black box.  Network security,
> as the term implies, involves the whole network.  This is a basic premise
> which I emphasize in my own consulting work; part of that bigger picture
> is EDUCATION.
> 
> I'm kind of disturbed by this "black box" approach of some of the commercial
> outfits.  Sure, the black box might be a useful tool, but it's not the whole
> enchilada by any means..
> 
> [I guess this mini-rant is aimed mostly at the newbies...]
> 
> _H*
> 

I have "AIR-GAP" (tm) in -my- black-box "network security firewall".
Feel Better?  :)

-- 
--bill


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Corrected pointers to Digital Firewall Services info (SEAL)
From: maass @ odb . rhein-main . de (Joerg Maass)
Next: Re: Firewall Software
From: wallynet @ panix . com (Walter F. Netman)
Indexed By Thread Previous: commercial vs roll-yer-own
From: hobbit @ bronze . lcs . mit . edu (*Hobbit*)
Next: Products and Services
From: Hartmut Pohl <100436 . 3361 @ compuserve . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com