>
> FC contributes:
...
> Not bad - seems more thorough than most - still misses a lot
> Such as?
...
> since - misses too many problems
> Such as?
...
> but reports don't indicate the extent of success or failure.
> I think the reader gets the idea by now...
>
> So Fred, from whence do we FTP down your be-all and end-all security
> scanning kit, since what we already have is obviously so useless?
You seem to think I was not sincere. I was. I am interested in more
and better tools that others have developed. I am not trying to get
anyone to buy anything from me by asking the question, and if and when I
see ways to improve existing public domain tools, I mention them to the
authors off-line. I don't believe that technology is the be-all and
end-all to information protection, but I do believe that good tools are
very important to technical aspects of protection.
FC
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
