Firewalls: Re: Which free 386 Unix flavor is best for a firewall ?

Firewalls
(February 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Which free 386 Unix flavor is best for a firewall ?
From:	Rens Troost <rens @ imsi . com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Feb 1995 08:26:41 -0500
To:	Paul Traina <pst @ cisco . com>
Cc:	jeffrl @ nuchat . sccsi . com (Jeff Libman), firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Mon, 06 Feb 1995 16:47:05 PST." <199502070047 . QAA00427 @ feta . cisco . com>
Reply-to:	rens @ imsi . com

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Traina <pst @
 cisco .
 com> writes:
  Paul> While I most definitely agree with the idea of "buying" your
  Paul> UNIX from BSDI, if, for some reason, that's not an interesting
  Paul> option, I would like to point out that FreeBSD 2.0 and newer
  Paul> has packet-filtering firewall support code built right into
  Paul> the system (configurable as a kernel option).

NetBSD support for a packet filter is also imminent.

-Rens

References:

Re: Which free 386 Unix flavor is best for a firewall ?
From: Paul Traina <pst @ cisco . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Firewalls-Digest V4 #92[562]rietveld @ bdypwt:/d1/usr/users/rietveld % arp -a \| grep btp019 From: Joost Rietveld <rietveld @ KNMI . NL>
Indexed By Date	Next:	X anyone ? From: "McMullen, Michael K." <mmcmulle @ gp801 . jsc . nasa . gov>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Which free 386 Unix flavor is best for a firewall ? From: Paul Traina <pst @ cisco . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	FW-1 and DECnet/Appletalk/IPX From: "Bill VanRemmen U. of Rochester (716)275-4825" <BILLY @ urhep . pas . rochester . edu>