daemon @
anon .
penet .
fi wrote :
> From daemon @
anon .
penet .
fi Thu Feb 9 23:40:45 1995
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 00:24:39 +0200
> From: daemon @
anon .
penet .
fi
> Message-Id: <9502092224 .
AA26943 @
anon .
penet .
fi>
> To: lavondes @
tidtest .
total .
fr
> Subject: Anonymous message failed (wrong password)
>
> The message you sent to the anonymous server could not be processed, as your
> password (in the X-Anon-Password: header) didn't match the one stored in the
> server. Either you have made a mistake, or somebody has used your account and
> changed the password. If the latter is the case, please contact
> admin @
anon .
penet .
fi .
>
> Contents of failed message:
>
> -------------------------
> X-Envelope-To: an196844
> Received: by anon.penet.fi (5.67/1.35)
> id AA23271; Thu, 9 Feb 95 22:54:35 +0200
> [some headers deleted]
> Received: (daemon @
localhost) by miles.greatcircle.com (8.6.9/Miles-941015-1) id KAA03913 for firewalls-outgoing; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 10:03:58 -0800
> [rest of headers and message deleted]
I interpret that message as meaning that anonymous account
an196844 receives messages sent to firewalls @
greatcircle .
com,
either as a subscriber or through automatic forwarding. Am I
right ? If so, can one of you postmasters/admins do something
about it ? Should I go on bothering every firewalls subscriber
with what may be trivial lack of netiquette ? Am I hopelessly
naive/outdated/<whatever> ?
Regards
--
Michel Lavondes
E-Mail : lavondes @
tidtest .
total .
fr
lavondes%tidtest .
total .
fr @
pegase .
total .
fr (if previous addr rejected)
Tel : +33-1-4135-4198
Fax : +33-1-4135-4189
|
|
