Mike Geipel wrote :
>
> [snip]
>
> On the subject of whether anonymous subscribers should be allowed:
> I have absolutely no problem with anonymous subscribers to a security
> list. I completely understand the desire to do so. I certainly hope
> that we do NOT start censoring people who read this list!
>
++flame;
Sorry, I can't follow you there. True, I have no problem with lurkers (ie,
people who stay quiet and just listen), but I still want to know who
subscribes to the list, or at list their (assumed) site, so I have someone
to complain to, just in case. Just in case you wonder, I do the same with
direct messages to me - delete without reading if anonymous, complain to
someone supposedly responsible at their site if I feel it necessary.
--flame;
Regards
--
Michel Lavondes
E-Mail : lavondes @
tidtest .
total .
fr
lavondes%tidtest .
total .
fr @
pegase .
total .
fr (if previous addr rejected)
Tel : +33-1-4135-4198
Fax : +33-1-4135-4189
Follow-Ups:
|
|
