Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Sysco Routers Son't Do Security
From: <mark_kadrich @ ins . com> (Mark S. Kadrich)
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 14:22:21 -0700
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

>
>> 
>> I just talked to a Sysco Router yesterday, and she said that they don't
>> do any security functions.  They just tell the drivers where to go.  And
>> in terms of acting as a firewall, she said that she would almost
>> certainly get burned. 
>>
>
>Um, Fred, that's 'cisco,' not 'sysco.'
>
>I can't imagine anyone from cisco Systems saying _anything_ like that.
>
>- paul
>
>
A call to your friendly cisco rep will confirm what the good Doctor has
stated (however incorrectly). However, Cisco will say that the capabilities
of their routers (rooters? ;-) are an important aspect of any well designed
security parameter.  Cisco does not like to consider their products as
stand-alone security devices.  I suspect their lawyers have had a hand in
this stance.  
******************************************************************
Mark S. Kadrich, Systems Engineer, International Network Services
"The Power of Operable Networks"
Voice @ 415-254-4225, Page @ 1-800-514-0355
e-mail @ kadrich @
 uni .
 ins .
 com
Information security is a process, not a solution.
******************************************************************



Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Sysco Routers Son't Do Security
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk @ panix . com>
Next: Re: Perimeter networks (Was: DMZ ?s)
From: paul @ hawksbill . sprintmrn . com (Paul Ferguson)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Sysco Routers Son't Do Security
From: paul @ hawksbill . sprintmrn . com (Paul Ferguson)
Next: Re: Perimeter networks (Was: DMZ ?s)
From: gregg @ interaccess . com (Gregg Rosenberg)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com