Firewalls: Re: Firewall failure modes (was Re: performance)

Firewalls
(April 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Firewall failure modes (was Re: performance)
From:	"Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ zen . void . oz . au>
Date:	Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:53:38 +1000
To:	fc @ all . net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
Cc:	firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 95 21:17:42 -0400." <9504240117 . AA21779 @ all . net>

> that they prevent the sorts of errors I have discussed.  I offer as
> evidence of the continued existence of these potential flaws, the
> eternal <defunct> processes that still exist even in modern versions of
> Unix. 

Sorry, how is the presence of <defunct> processes evidence of anything
but the existence of sloppy (or clueless) programmers?

--sjg

References:

Re: Firewall failure modes (was Re: performance)
From: fc @ all . net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)

Indexed By Date	Previous:	French mailing list From: "Kare Presttun" <Kare . Presttun @ ansf . alcatel . fr>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Firewall failure modes (was Re: performance) From: emwmf @ emw . ericsson . se (Martin Fredriksson)
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Firewall failure modes (was Re: performance) From: fc @ all . net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Firewall failure modes (was Re: performance) From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)