Firewalls: Re: IP addresses behind a firewall.

Firewalls
(August 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: IP addresses behind a firewall.
From:	Joe Provo <jprovo @ ultra . net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Aug 1995 17:37:50 -0400
To:	bmanning @ ISI . EDU, jprovo @ ultra . net
Cc:	afoss @ translation . com, firewalls @ greatcircle . com

>> [clip RFC 1597 solution]
>> This is an amazingly poor solution, sticking one's head into the sand.

Just a minor nit:  I'm a *supportor* of RFC 1597.  The solution I was
criticizing was to ignore the fact that one was using someone else's
addresses on the "hidden" side of a translator.

I've seen an early form of the draft, btw, and it looks good.

Joe Provo


   Network Operations Center                UltraNet Communications Inc.
     508.229.8400(voice)       jprovo @
 ultra .
 net        508.229.2375(fax)

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: tests for firewall From: nabadm @ odo . acdnj . itt . com (set chaos/total)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: SunOS vs Solaris 2 vs Intel/BSD for firewalls From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ iwi . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: IP addresses behind a firewall. From: Joe Provo <jprovo @ ultra . net>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	attackers vs. defenders (Re: attacks, etc...) From: d <zen @ flying . fish . com>