Received: from relay2.UU.NET by spaatz.cap.af.mil
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.7 for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1995Oct04.125109.0.8805; Wed, 04 Oct 1995 12:51:09 -0500
Received: from miles.greatcircle.com by relay2.UU.NET with ESMTP
id QQzjyf20945; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:28:48 -0400
Received: (majordom @
localhost) by miles.greatcircle.com (8.6.9/Miles-950430-1)
id UAA05431 for firewalls-outgoing; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 20:52:03 -0700
Received: from uuneo.neosoft.com (uuneo.neosoft.com [206.109.1.3]) by
miles.greatcircle.com (8.6.9/Miles-950430-1) with ESMTP id UAA05424 for
<firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM>; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 20:52:00 -0700
Received: from ris1.UUCP (ficc @
localhost) by uuneo.neosoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10)
with UUCP id WAA09928 for GreatCircle.COM!firewalls; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 22:33:46
-0500
Received: by ris1.nmti.com (smail2.5)
id AA18501; 3 Oct 95 19:37:40 CDT (Tue)
Received: by sonic.nmti.com; id AA11758; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 20:04:29 -0500
From: peter @
nmti .
com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <9510040104 .
AA11758 @
sonic .
nmti .
com .
nmti .
com>
Subject: Re: FW to FW FTP w/ no port > 1023
To: sgcccdc @
citec .
qld .
gov .
au (Colin Campbell)
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 20:04:28 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: wbunting @
ch .
inri .
com, firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM
In-Reply-To: <9510022336 .
AA14998 @
citecub .
citec .
qld .
gov .
au> from "Colin
Campbell" at Oct 3, 95 09:36:16 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 341
Sender: firewalls-owner @
GreatCircle .
COM
Precedence: bulk
> > 3. Do not use FTP and write a TCP application that uses only a single TCP
> > port for data and control. Issues: Time + $$ no compatibility. Benefit:
> > solves the problem.
FSP and HTTP are both candidates for this application. And they've already
been written. NNTP would work as well, and can be proxied with a simple
plug gateway.
|
|
