Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Various FTPs
From: sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au (Colin Campbell)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 95 9:51:28 EST
To: matt @ uts . EDU . AU (Jas)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199510131806 . EAA04335 @ lordmuck . itd . uts . edu . au>; from "Jas" at Oct 14, 95 4:06 am

Hi,

My mailer thinks Jas said:
> 
> Scott Barman wrote this...
> 
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 1995 padgett @
 tccslr .
 dnet .
 mmc .
 com wrote:
> 
> >> I agree with Marcus concerning the probloms in FTP & possibly IPV6
> >> will repair/replace it. For now I suspect that the answer is a
> 
> > I have been "observing" the output of the IETF for IPv6 and have seen
> > nothing regarding changing ftp.  It seems their concerns are a larger
> > address space and security.  I don't think I'm alone in my desire to see
> > something replace it and, as Marcus Ranum said about himself in a previous
> > note, I'm not "big" enough to try to force a change!
> 
> well why dont we put our collective heads together and make a firewall
> friendly file transfer protocol? then we can have people write up the
> code on different platforms (we have enough knowledge here for almost
> every possible conceivable platform), and GPL the stuff. well? any
> takers? myself personally im in.
>  

Why doesn't PASV do the trick?

Colin


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Firewall1 Comparison -Reply
From: sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au (Colin Campbell)
Next: FTP vulnerabilities
From: "A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Various FTPs
From: Jas (Matthew K) <matt @ uts . EDU . AU>
Next: Re: Various FTPs
From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com