Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Mail Proxy
From: pmc @ telepac . pt (Pedro de Melo Ribeiro da Cunha)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 11:05:57 GMT
To: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
References: <9510031252 . AA13463 @ ig1 . att . att . com>
Reply-to: pmc @ telepac . pt

On Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:54:35 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>Also, it is possible to virus scan the binaries that have been
>detected.  However, general consensus is that such scanning is
>ineffective because it only cover one channel of binaries to the PC,
>(Floppy disks are another).  Virus scanning must be done at the PC.

Yes, so maybe what should be done is to get the
programmers of mail users agents or news browsers to
include the option of passing a virus scanner over
the attachements.

[Simplistic mode on...]
That should do it, rigth?
[Simplistic mode off...]

Melo
************************* email: pmc @
 telepac .
 pt **************************
*    The difference between a boy and a man is the price of his toys     *
*   LINUX is for people who want to *earn* the right to login as ROOT    *
******** Finger melo @
 orpheu .
 ci .
 uminho .
 pt or Key Servers for PGP key ******



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Brewer et al. on ``Basic Flaws in Internet Security and
From: Russ Cooper <rcooper @ the-wire . com>
Next: Re: Re[2]: Brewer et al. on ``B
From: fmrco!ocean!ajl @ uunet . uu . net (Andrew Luca)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Mail Proxy
From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
Next: Re[2]: Mail Proxy
From: Steve_Betts @ ccmailgw . biss . co . uk (Steve Betts)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com