Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: NT Firewall
From: "Stephen H. Goldstein" <steveg @ cseic . saic . com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 21:00:34 -0400
To: LASDSDN @ ix . netcom . com (LASD DSB)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

At 04:55 PM 10/18/95 -0700, LASD DSB wrote:
>In appending to Ricardo's question, is NT a safe enviornment for a 
>firewall.  Our entire network is Unix based but we are slowly adding NT 
>clients.  We would very much like to implement an application-gateway on 
>NT due to the price attraction of NT on a PC rather than a Unix 
>workstation. Any comments?
>
>Thanks
>
>Fabian
>(310) 465-7869
>
If "price attraction" of NT is the only reason, why not get
BSDI Unix?  It runs on PCs and seems to be the Unix of choice for 
"9 out of 10" firewall implementors (who then do their own various 
and sundry things to the kernel to "harden" it).
---
Stephen Goldstein     steveg @
 cseic .
 saic .
 com
My first computer:    A 24K Atari 800, Rev. A ROMS, November 1980
       Disclaimer:    That's not what I said.


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: NT Firewall
From: Steve Kennedy <steve @ gbnet . org>
Next: Re: Brewer et al. on ``Basic Flaws in Internet Security and
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: NT Firewall
From: LASDSDN @ ix . netcom . com (LASD DSB)
Next: Re: NT Firewall
From: pnh1rgr @ mclo20 . med . navy . mil (Bob Resino)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com