Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Secret key versus obscurity
From: jsanchez @ esegi . es (Julio Sanchez)
Organization: SGI Soluciones Globales Internet
Date: 22 Nov 1995 18:10:43 GMT
To: gmv-gw-lists-firewalls @ gmv . es
Newsgroups: gmv.gw-lists.firewalls
References: <199511220330 . WAA04548 @ switchblade . iwi . com>

Marcus J. Ranum (mjr @
 iwi .
 com) wrote:
: 
: 	No, it does not. Let's be careful with our terminology
: here. SecurID and many HHAs rely on "secret key" techniques
: for security. In other words, there is some kind of hidden
: shared secret which is used to encrypt/authenticate. That is
: not anywhere even remotely at all like being in the ballpark
: of "security through obscurity" unless you call having a
: secret encryption key "obscurity" in which case virtually
: all security is via obscurity and nothing more.

I was always told that "security through obscurity" is relying solely
on something that, if compromised, cannot be changed easily. So a
key is not, an algorithm will usually be, a specific hardware device
design is.

I think that criterion helps a lot in telling when we have STO.

Julio

-- 
Julio Sanchez, SGI Soluciones Globales Internet
Tel/Fax: 91/804 14 05  WWW: http://www.esegi.es
jsanchez @
 esegi .
 es jsanchez @
 gmv .
 es
 PGP Key fingerprint =  E5 29 93 6F 41 4E 00 E2  90 11 A1 8C 72 D0 DE 71 


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Secret key versus obscurity
From: carson @ lehman . com
Next: inetd
From: "Jim Meritt" <jmeritt @ smtpinet . aspensys . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Secret key versus obscurity
From: carson @ lehman . com
Next: RE: Secret key versus obscurity
From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod @ brd . ie>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com