Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: FW: Windows NT holes and Lotus Notes holes (fwd)
From: Russ Cooper <rcooper @ the-wire . com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:50:03 -0500
To: Chris Brenton <chris . brenton @ newsedge . com>, "'Ron DuFresne'" <dufresne @ winternet . com>
Cc: "'firewalls @ greatcircle . com'" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>

As far as I am aware, only UDP port 139 is potentially dangerous, as it is 
used to handle netbios session information. UDP 137 is used for browsing, 
so it can be a source of information that you might not want advertised 
(i.e. machine names, domain names, etc...), and UDP 138 is the datagram 
port.

As for compromising a system, if you can get a machine name, then every NT 
server has a share called \\machine_name\c$, and far too many have left 
user Administrator with rights to everything. If the NT box hasn't 
implemented security controls (i.e. limiting the number of invalid password 
attempts) and is not using Alerter to inform an authority of disabled 
users, then hacking into an NT box comes down to pounding away on 
\\machine_name\c$ as user Administrator with password "x". If port 139 is 
open, and you have the domain name in addition to the machine name, then 
you can pound away at logging into the domain as user Administrator with 
password "x". If port 137 is open then you can get both the machine name 
and the domain name assuming WINS is enabled on the known machine (if the 
machine is running NBT its more than likely running WINS).

Cheers,
Russ Cooper
Senior Internet Integration Engineer
SHL/Computer Innovations
RCooper @
 the-wire .
 com - Express @
 msn .
 com - 74323 .
 364 @
 compuserve .
 com



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: chroot/setuid vs type enforcement
From: Ted Stockwell <stockwel @ sctc . com>
Next: Re: Windows NT holes and Lotus Notes holes (fwd)
From: Hannu Tapio Pys{ys <htp @ smek . fi>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Windows NT holes and Lotus Notes holes (fwd)
From: Ray Hooker <rayhook @ ibm . net>
Next: Re: FW: Windows NT holes and Lotus Notes holes (fwd)
From: Torsten Sturm <tnsturm @ cip . informatik . uni-erlangen . de>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com