Daniel O'Callaghan wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Dec 1995, Ken Hardy wrote:
>> Q: What kind of luck have you or anyone had with the Harvest cache?
>> I'm thinking of putting one on the inside and allowing only it to
>> access the firewall, forcing everyone internally to use the cache,
>> taking a load off of the firewall. Are there any problems with it, or
>> is it pretty robust? The paper describing its design and performance
>> is pretty convincing:
>Version 1.3 is the release version. 1.4pl5 seemed pretty stable to me.
>Current is 1.4pl23 or 24 (I have not checked this morning). I found 18
>and 20 to be pretty unstable.
One problem I've had with it is that, on very slow connections (such as
the ones we get here in Ireland) it sometimes times out before the
file is fully transferred.
--j. "Ed is the standard text editor." -- ed(1)