Firewalls: re: Dial-in

Firewalls
(December 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	re: Dial-in
From:	"A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Dec 1995 8:35:32 -0500 (EST)
To:	firewalls @ greatcircle . com

>But you would have to horribly invade the privacy of your inbound callers 
>by requiring them to not block ANI (which a few states may allow, I'm not 
>current).

We have different worldviews. How is it an "invasion of privacy" if I
refuse to receive any call that is blocked ? Or is it an invasion if
I refuse to open my door to people wearing pointy masks ? IMNSHO
*you* are invading *my* privacy to claim that I must act differently.

					Warmly,
						Padgett
ps "Who is John Galt"

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Dial-In access From: daemeonr @ Anthros . Com@Anthros.Com
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: IP fragments and packet filters From: "Eric V. Smith" <EricSmith @ windsor . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: IP fragments and packet filters From: mbenard @ nanaimo . ark . com (Mike)
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Holes in SunOS sendmail -Reading Root Mail From: gscpraba @ ns2 . emirates . net . ae (G.S.C.Prabhakar (The Sun))