Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewall design - routers and commercial kit
From: jim @ SmallWorks . COM (Jim Thompson)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:30:14 -0600
To: dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

>  Seems to me the obvious way (sort of) to do this is to use a screened subnet
>arrangement.  Ok .. fine.  Am I duplicating kit doing this ?  That is, by using
>an exterior and interior router to create a screened net off which would hang
>the commercial firewall etc, am I duplicating the routing function of the
>commercial firewall or don't they have the same level of control over routing
>as a CISCO would for example ?

Some firewalls do.  (NetGate and Firewall-1 do.)  Actually, you can get better
control with some of these than you can with a Cisco.  For instance, you can't
filter on ICMP type and code with Cisco's access lists...

Jim


Indexed By Date Previous: RE: firewalls reviews/comparisons
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
Next: RE: MITNICK & THE TCP SEQUENCE NUMBER ATTACK ON SHIMOMURA (L
From: gblolmxb @ ibmmail . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: Firewall design - routers and commercial kit
From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
Next: Re: Firewall design - routers and commercial kit
From: Rick Smith <smith @ sctc . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com