Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Survey
From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 96 11:05:02 -0500
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
Reply-to: "KM" <goertzek @ wangfed . com>

In message <199602061540 .
 KAA18136 @
 Fe3 .
 rust .
 net> "Kenneth J. Stephens" writes:

> If the magazine publishers forced the issue date onto all of their reprints
> the vendors would have little use for the reprints.  The date stamp would
> obsolete 
> the reprint so quickly that the vendor would look foolish for distributing
> old info.  One of the hazards of a dynamic industry.  


So what you're saying is that the publishers, in collusion with the vendors, are
being dishonest by omission.  Why doesn't this suprise me?



------------------------------------------------------
Karen Goertzel
Manager, International Programmes and Special Projects
Secure Systems and Services Operation
Wang Federal, Inc.
7900 Westpark Drive - MS 700
McLean, Virginia  22102-4299
TEL: 703-827 3914
FAX: 703-827 3161
goertzek @
 wangfed .
 com
http://www.wangfed.com

+------------------------------+
| It infuriates me to be wrong |
| when I know I'm right.       |
|                   -- Moliere |
+------------------------------+


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: NT's TCP/IP stack + NetManage NEWT conflict.
From: NetSurfer <netsurf @ pixi . com>
Next: ipx routing
From: "Lehrer, Neil" <nlehrer @ usia . gov>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Survey
From: Sten Drescher <stend @ grendel . texas . net>
Next: Re: Does SMTP allow security breaches.
From: Brent @ GreatCircle . COM (Brent Chapman)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com