Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: port 113?
From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:22:11 -0500 (EST)
To: Kyle Amon <kyle_amon @ jabil . com>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9601148243 . AA824307224 @ jabil . com>

On Tue, 13 Feb 1996, Kyle Amon wrote:

>      Is there any reason (other than the loss of remote user identification
>      services on my host) that I might _not_ want to disable identd?

I think it's one of those "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" 
things. Identd is definitely an "administrator-friendly" protocol. 
Disabling identd will not be directly detrimental to your site, unless you
have lots of IRC users and that is a service which your site policy
provides. Some IRC channels do not allow users from hosts that do not have
identd running properly (or at all). 

If every site were to disable identd, then many web servers and
network-access monitoring tools would be "crippled" wrt logging. 

  Chris  Woods					cjwoods @
 paladin .
 com
  Systems/Network Administrator			vox 617-273-4226
  Paladin Computing Solutions, Inc.		http://www.paladin.com/



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: tcpdump modifications
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
Next: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: port 113?
From: Kyle Amon <kyle_amon @ jabil . com>
Next: Re: port 113?
From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com