Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: ip masquerading
From: Su Yunfei <syf @ info . scsti . ac . cn>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 11:36:10 +0800 (CST)
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <176BE715E5 @ lug . utb . falun . se>

   Hello, everybody.

   Now I donot have enough ip address, I want to put another network 
connect to internet using the following two way:

       1. Cisco Internet Junction. 
   This is a gateway to using ipx in local network, if one machine asked 
for internet function, it must attach to a ij gateway. But we found that 
in Win95, if you start ij client, the tcp/ip packages in Win95 Plus can't 
run correctly, but netscape or other winsock application is ok. And the 
ij Server's efficiency is an anxious problem.

       2. Linux masquerading.
   Using a linux machine act as a gateway, and the interior machines 
using virtual ip address, virtual ip address can masqurade by linux 
another validable ip address. But they said there are some bugs in it so 
I worry about it's stability.

    Each of two ways has it's advantage and defect. Would somebody give 
me some advice about this, Or another way, another product.

   Thankful advancely.


                                      Yunfei  Su






References:
  • [no subject]
    From: "Daniel Ahlberg" <ALIZ @ lug . utb . falun . se>
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Undeliverable: email to CEO
From: "William S. Duncanson" <william @ neosoft . com>
Next: Re: Firewalls at lower levels?
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Indexed By Thread Previous: [no subject]
From: "Daniel Ahlberg" <ALIZ @ lug . utb . falun . se>
Next: Lotus Notes/plug-gw/database replication
From: Dick Locke <rlocke @ raleigh . ibm . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com