Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RAS and technical people
From: William Richter <richterb @ ccnet . com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: firewalls-digest @ greatcircle . com

Having the PBX gurus remove the DID number for incoming 
lines that are not approved might not be the best.  This limits
the number of inbound trunck to the PBX.  The advent of 
caller ID and ANI numbers allows most folks to determine
what their line is.

Changing the class of service on the extension to only
allow station to station calling, deny call forwarding,
etc, is probably easier.  Many folks still order 1MB
lines to bypass the PBX cause the PBX causes interference
so that fix doesn't work.  Then you have to get the 
telco to make the telephone not accept incoming calls.
Policy backed up by effective enforcement seems to make 
an excellent solution.


Indexed By Date Previous: UUCP vs. Anonymous FTP
From: Jasjit K Singh <Jasjit_K_Singh @ amrcorp . com>
Next: RE: Firewalls at lower levels?
From: Bill Stout <bstout @ osc . hitachi . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: RAS and technical people
From: johns @ oxygen . house . gov (John Schnizlein)
Next: Re: RAS and technical people
From: Dale Drew <ddrew @ mci . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com