Firewalls: Re: Solaris2.5 and BSD*

Firewalls
(April 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	*Re: Solaris2.5 and BSD - Facts**
From:	Matthew Hannigan <mha73 @ qantas . com . au>
Date:	Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:03:48 +1100 (CUT)
To:	Jake Hamby <jehamby @ lightside . com>
Cc:	Scott Barman <scott @ di2 . disclosure . com>, Dave Roberts <djr @ saa-cons . co . uk>, Firewalls Mailing List <Firewalls @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to:	<Pine . AUX . 3 . 91 . 960415101429 . 23446A-100000 @ covina . lightside . com>

On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, Jake Hamby wrote:

> Okay, fair enough.  Perhaps I should actually test the latest Sun compiler
> before blindly defending GCC.  :-)

Yes, a good idea.  I'm a fan of the FSF but really..

> Out of curiosity, is Sun's C++ compiler still implemented with 
> AT&T Cfront, or is it native now?

It's been native so long now, that people have forgotten what cfront is.
Or was.

--
	-Matt

PS. reply address is probably wrong.  please use mha73 @
 qantek .
 com .
 au

References:

Re: Solaris2.5 and BSD* - Facts
From: Jake Hamby <jehamby @ lightside . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	RE: Cracking NT via RAS From: nkeenan @ gsionline . com (Nick Keenan)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Cisco IOS levels From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	*Re: Solaris2.5 and BSD - Facts** From: Jake Hamby <jehamby @ lightside . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	*Re: Solaris2.5 and BSD - Facts** From: Scott Barman <scott @ di2 . disclosure . com>