Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Cisco IOS levels
From: Ken Lee <klee @ cmprime . att . com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:21:02 EDT
To: pferguso @ cisco . com
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199604160341 . UAA11944 @ lint . cisco . com>; from "Paul Ferguson" at Apr 15, 96 11:42 pm
Original-from: Ken Lee <cmprime!klee>
Posted-date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:21:02 -0400

> 
> >
> >Having seen the recent postings about the Cisco syslog functionality I am
> >now unsure which is the best version of the IOS to run.
> >
> >Am I better off sticking with 10.3(8) or can I trust any of the 11.x versions
> >on a firewall router ?
> >
> Insofar as access-lists are concerned, 11.1 is fine.
> 
> The latest revision of 10.3, however, is in GD (general deployment).

Have there been problems with the Cisco syslog functionality or security?
I haven't seen anything about this until now.

klee @
 cmprime .
 att .
 com


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Cisco IOS levels
From: "W.C. Epperson" <epperson @ vak12ed . edu>
Next: NAT (Network Address Translation)
From: smithk @ dg-rtp . dg . com (Keith Smith)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Cisco IOS levels
From: "W.C. Epperson" <epperson @ vak12ed . edu>
Next: Re: Cisco IOS levels
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com