Ty Gast wrote:
>
> We have done some work with it. It's a relatively strong firewall but =
> is lacking in some areas. For instance, it doesn't support =
> transparencies. Also, authentication procedures for coming inside from =
> the outside are limited to just one method (tokens)... you cannot use =
> other methods such as username/passwords (as if you would), or s/key. =
> The interface uses a web browser (just like SATAN). Fairly easy to set =
> up and get started, too.
In keeping with general mailing list policy, I'm not going to say much.
If you want more info, go to
http://www.digital.com/info/internet/brochure/fwunix_features.html
Just to clarify, however, version 2.0 of the product (just out, phew!)
supports transparent proxies, and a whole slew of HHAs and s/key. Any
other questions, send them to me directly...
- Der
--
Dermot Tynan +353 91 754608
dtynan @
ilo .
dec .
com DTN: 822-4608
Digital Equipment International BV, Galway, Ireland
References:
|
|
