Firewalls: Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #253

Firewalls
(April 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #253
From:	Shaik Nazim Shaik Ibrahim <snazim @ its . iiu . my>
Date:	Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:29:32 +0800 (MYT)
To:	Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour @ origin-at . co . uk>
Cc:	Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<1 . 5 . 4 . 16 . 19960423105610 . 2c6f12e8 @ gatekeeper>

If the command has a separate data file to disable, then use it
else the port has to be restricted or the command put into another
group (this actually creates more work, I don't like it myself)

According to firewall concept, the said command must have the
extended routine (allow/deny) so I would say upgrade the command,
this applies to the Unix writers.

If I am mistaken then cancel this message.

References:

Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #253
From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour @ origin-at . co . uk>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	RE: VIRUS IN PKZIP300.zip From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Access of cc:Mail thru Firewall From: "MURALIKRISHNAK" <MURALIKRISHNAK @ inf . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #253 From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour @ origin-at . co . uk>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Custom built application and the ability to pass the Firewall From: ghharrac @ ouray . cudenver . edu (George/Jorge)