Cisco has a NAT. See www.cisco.com
At 04:49 PM 4/25/96 -0700, Brian Murrell wrote:
>I realize the level of (in)security NAT (network address translation)
>delivers, but we need it for it's intended purposes of address translation,
>and not security value.
>I'm looking for commercial vendors of NAT devices. I don't want/need the
>overhead of proxying systems or any firewalling. I simply want to plug in
>addresses/networks and what address they should be translated to to.
>Brian J. Murrell Brian_Murrell @
>BCTel Advanced Communications brian @
>Vancouver, B.C. brian @
>604 454 5279