Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Gauntlet - Better front end available???
From: gcl @ nikko . com (George Lee)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 96 17:26:27 EDT
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

> From firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM Fri Apr 26 15:17:31 1996
> 
> I've been comparing fw1 and gauntlet.  I am satisfied that the 
> security differences between them are *fairly* negligable- however in 
> an organisation where there is not a great deal of Unix skill the 
> front end for firewall-1 seems infinitely better.
> 
> The HTML  front end for Gauntlet looks pretty bad to be honest - 
> especially compared to the FW1.  Anyone know if there is a better one 
> in the pipeline?  Or even FW1 porting to SGI?
> 
> Any comments appreciated, 
> 
> Ben
> 


Hi All,

	We are also trying to conduct a comparison between fw1 and
Gauntlet...However, I was not able to get a Gauntlet demo...

Question:  What are the PROS and CONS between using an intel box vs.
		UNIX box ?  (beside pricing and support)...

Also, I thought that Gauntlet would be a better choice if the organization
is limited in UNIX skills/support...because Gauntlet being a plug and go type.


G:-)


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Loops in Firewalls mailing list again
From: "<root>" <root @ wolf . microserve . com>
Next: Dial-Up Integrity of Notes on OS/2 and NetWare
From: "Peter Galloway" <galloway @ oznet02 . ozemail . com . au>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Gauntlet - Better front end available???
From: "Ben Goodyear" <ac141 @ typhoon . dial . pipex . net>
Next: Re: Gauntlet - Better front end available???
From: lear @ yeager . corp . sgi . com (Eliot Lear)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com