Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Round-robin DNS?
From: William Brown <bbrown @ cac . stratus . com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 96 17:04:59 -0400
To: jnoetzel @ intermind . com (Jeremy Noetzelman)
Cc: axel . skough @ scb . se, firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <2 . 2 . 32 . 19960611194403 . 00eb4cc4 @ intermind . com>
References: <2 . 2 . 32 . 19960611194403 . 00eb4cc4 @ intermind . com>


>Also, the Microsoft says that zone transfer is not properly implemented
>among the Unix BIND versions which caused some trouble. Due to this certain 
>DNS/BIND versions on some implementations will be incompatible. I wonder if 
>this is true? If so, the obvious conclusion should be that  one has to avoid 
>intermixing DNS/BIND from different vendors and/or platforms (indeed, a good 
>principle regardless product, anyhow).
>
>Any comments?

If the MS version of DNS/BIND does not work with the standard UNIX DNS/BIND  
then MS has bugs to fix.  MS cannot decide that what has been in production  
for years is wrong simply because they interpret the spec differently.

To be honest, there were several times during my DNS hacking days when I  
said to myself while reading the code, "Ah, so that's how it really works".   
This was especially true in the zone transfer arena.  At the time, I could  
find no reference in the spec to the exact manner in which zone transfers  
should occur.  I suspect this situation has not changed.

				Bill Brown


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Round-robin DNS?
From: jnoetzel @ intermind . com (Jeremy Noetzelman)
Next: MS DNS (was: Re: Round-robin DNS?)
From: girsch @ marben . com (Arnaud Girsch)
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Round-robin DNS?
From: jnoetzel @ intermind . com (Jeremy Noetzelman)
Next: Re: Round-robin DNS?
From: dwh @ translation . com (David Hawkins)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com