Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: New Firewall Announcement
From: Michel Lavondes <lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 11:34:13 +0100
To: jnoetzel @ intermind . com (Jeremy Noetzelman)
Cc: Jean Vincent <jvincent @ actane . com>, Steve Kennedy <steve @ gbnet . org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:41:08 PDT."

In message <2 .
 2 .
 32 .
 19960611194108 .
 00b2d8dc @
 intermind .
 com>, Jeremy Noetzelman wr
ites:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Am I the only one who doesnt like the idea of my firewall being managed by
> SNMP? Seems to me to be a step backwards in security. Why not just toss an
> Xserver up there and let everyone use it?
> 
Don't worry, you're not alone.

<musing>

There was some lively discussion a few months ago on comp.dcom.sys.cisco
(aka cisco @
 spot .
 colorado .
 edu) regarding what cisco calls "customer-linkable
images" (basically, a way for customers to pick the exact features they
need, link the required object files, and get a custom image, instead of
being stuck with whatever feature sets cisco consider right for us :-).

If done the right way, this could help a lot with securing the firewall
(eg, IP routing, static routes only, no telnet, no SNMP). AFAIK, though,
cisco didn't commit as to whether/when this will come out.

</musing>

Michel Lavondes (lavondes @
 tidtest .
 total .
 fr)
#include <disclaimer.h>
Governments are guilty until proved innocent

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Secure Telnet to External Sites.
From: David Vincenzetti <vince @ cryptonet . it>
Next: Re: Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java?
From: Michel Lavondes <lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: New Firewall Announcement
From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
Next: Re: New Firewall Announcement
From: "Rudy Amid" <rudy @ hummingbird . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com