Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Cisco 2500's and BGP
From: John Betts <johnb @ aztec . co . za>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 23:14:43 +0200 (SAT)
To: bwatson @ genuity . net (Brett Watson)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <c=US%a=_%p=GENUITY%l=GENIE-960612151802Z-1284 @ genie . genuity . net> from "Brett Watson" at Jun 12, 96 08:18:02 am
Reply-to: johnb @ aztec . co . za

% 
% On Wednesday, June 12, 1996 7:04 AM, J. Stroup[SMTP:joe @
 acme .
 nug .
 net]
% wrote:
% >>The answer is no.
% 
%   gee, that's news to me.  why can't he run bgp4 on a 2500?
% 
yeh, me too...

specially since the fact that alot of the routers at one
of the .za naps are 2500's (with 64k links being our comparative
to T1's...anything bigger is an overkill)

all you need is 32mb ram for a full table, or 16mb ram for
a half table

ciao

--
john

--
John Betts, Aztec Internet Services Port Elizabeth, South Africa
johnb @
 aztec .
 co .
 za,  Tel. +27(0)41 303 475, Fax. +27(0)41 301 052
The world is complex.  The Sendmail configuration reflects this.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Cisco 2500's and BGP
From: oolid @ acqic . org (Joseph L. Moll)
Next: Re: Cisco 2500's and BGP
From: Darrell Fuhriman <darrell @ teleport . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Cisco 2500's and BGP
From: "J. Stroup" <joe @ acme . nug . net>
Next: Re: Cisco 2500's and BGP
From: Michel Lavondes <lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com