Firewalls: Re: Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java?

Firewalls
(June 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java?
From:	peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 1996 09:45:16 -0500 (CDT)
To:	Michael_Beeler @ ccmail . northgrum . com
Cc:	jklein @ ncdc . noaa . gov, dufresne @ winternet . com, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<1BDF82A0 . 1557 @ ccmail . northgrum . com> from "Michael_Beeler @ ccmail . northgrum . com" at Jun 11, 96 02:37:38 pm

>      Just a thought, but does anyone know if Active-X is any more secure 
>      than JAVA?

Yes. It's not.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java?
From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>

References:

Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java?
From: Michael_Beeler @ ccmail . northgrum . com

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: New Firewall Announcement From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: IBM Firewall From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java? From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Re[2]: Active-X and/or Java? From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>