Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: CIFS - To Firewall or not to Firewall
From: jhall @ sqi . com (John Hall)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:52:52 -0700
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

CIFS looks to be purely a marketing move by M$ to try to push SMB again
as a "standard" protocol.  Unfortunately, M$ has no experience nor
inclination to produce secure products and SMB itself is neither
very secure, nor very efficient when used over TCP.

I think M$ is just trying to counter Sun's Public NFS announcement and
will not really push this unless they see significant interest.  One
thing to remember, though; this is the same protocol all the M$ products
use, so you will be opening up ALL your PC's (esp. NT and Win95) to attack.

							John Hall

-- 
Network Administrator, Postmaster +-------------------------------------------+
Siemens Medical Systems Inc.     /"You have to know who to threaten to punish |
Ultrasound Group                / and who to PROMISE to punish!" - Harry Ugol |
email: jhall @
 sqi .
 com           +----------------------------------------------+
Disclaimer:  Four score and seven years ago..... Uh what was the question??

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Gauntlet - How good is it?
From: John Betts <johnb @ aztec . co . za>
Next: Re: ftp problem
From: chris . liljenstolpe @ ssds . com (Christopher Liljenstolpe)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Address translation...
From: Eric vanBok <eric @ speech . com>
Next: A response from CSI
From: "Power, Richard" <rpower @ mfi . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com