Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: NAT - question
From: Ryan.Russell/SYBASE
Date: 26 Jun 96 12:50:59 EDT
To: "Crandall John" <crandaje @ Maritz . com>
Cc: "'Firewalls Mailing List'" <firewalls @ sybase . com>

FIrewall-1 from Checkpoint (or Sun or Qualix...) or
PIX (Private Internet eXchange) from Cisco.

     Ryan

---------- Previous Message ----------
To: firewalls
cc: 
From: crandaje @ Maritz.com ("Crandall, John") @ smtp
Date: 06/26/96 09:52:00 AM
Subject: NAT - question

We have to connect our enterprise network with another corporations
enterprise network (not the Internet)

Here's the scenario:

1) Inside workstations/hosts need to use their own network addresses
2) Inside workstations (600+) need to connect to outside hosts
3) Outside hosts will only allow connections with machines in it's own
address space
4) There are a handful of inside hosts that the outside hosts need to
communicate with (with outside static IP addresses)

The main concern is that I don't want to burn 600+ addresses from the
outside network to translate 1-to-1 when only a few of the inside hosts
need static IP addresses.  What I would like to do is translate the
inside workstations outbound connections to 1 outside address (like I
currently do with the Gauntlet firewall we use for the Internet) but be
able to give the internal hosts a static address in the outside address
space.


Question:

Which vendors offerings can meet the above criteria?





Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Re[2]: Java & ActiveX
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Next: Re:
From: anonymous-remailer @ shell . portal . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: NAT - question
From: "Crandall, John" <crandaje @ Maritz . com>
Next: Re: NAT - question
From: Mattias Lindström <mattias . lindstrom @ ihc . se>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com