Re: Catapult

[long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU]

KH <ken @
 bridge .
 com> wrote:
>If Catapult is offering something "Socks-like", but not socks, I'd like to
>know what its advantages are.  Does it, e.g., work with non-IP clients, as

Yes.  It can work with RWS clients running IPX/SPX.

>do various 3rd party ipx/ip gateways? That would justify a proprietary
>implementation, perhaps, but would not be incompatible with parallel
>support for Standard Socks TCP clients. 

- Morrow